local  
Green Networking Orange County environmental groups' websites
Friends of The Foothills SierraClub preserves last south OC open space
The End of Southern California Alexander Cockburn says adios to Aztlan
    indigenous
environmental issues
How to buy plywood in a green manner
local support for another Trail of Tears: Big Mountain
Black Mesa Indigenous Support contra 1996 Navajo-Hopi Settlement Act & Relocation law 93-531. Ask "native" candidate McCain's cheerleaders if he agrees Relocation = Genocide

U'wa vs Occidental Petroleum U.S. gives the Colombian military another $1.3 billion to force Native Americans off land they paid for as well as inherited so Los Angeles based Occidental Petroleum can sell you gasoline; US VP Al Gore is paid the dividends & a diploma. McKinneyM cf. final ¶
More re Gore.

Linguistic biodiversity
contra-indicative eco-tourism
    institutional
Environmental Politics N. Arizona University
Ctr for Restorative Ecology Univ Wisconsin
EarthFirst toolbox
Greenspiration Toronto locals go global
Libery Tree Alliance dated, but never stale. Info excellent, links even better.
Environmental Issues   from Capitol Reports
Environmental Health & Safety Online   for public & environmental health & safety professionals
Greenwash corporate spin & NGO funding defuse liability
"For industry, the greenhouse skeptics have been a good investment." "It's not easy being green, the brown opposition is well-funded & sneaky, with fake populist tactics" ( Corporate Watch )
7.25.01 Cong. McKinney re FOF vs RAN
Milloy/TASSC bunk debunk
Earth crash   omega   cf. John Brunner's The Sheep Look Up   1918 Spanish flu global plague cf USAMRIID H1N1 1997
sustainability
PBS exposé on chem. industry From: 2.16.00
Subject: ACTION ALERT - We need 1000 calls or emails today!

FRITOS-LAY has announced it would no longer use genetically engineered corn in its produces. THIS IS THE START OF SOMETHING BIG. The biotech giants have started a campaign to pressure Fritos to reverse their decision. If Fritos holds to their commitment, this may very well be the start of the downfall of genetically engineered foods in America.
FRITOS IS CAREFULLY WATCHING THE CONSUMER RESPONSE.
PLEASE send them an email or call them 1-800-352-4477 (ask for operator 100)
Tell them you applaud their decision. Tell them that you do NOT want to eat foods that have been genetically engineered to act as an insecticide. Tell them that you don't believe that genetically engineered food is safe for consumer or environmental health and you commend the direction they are taking. And that it would be a big disappointment if they cave in and reverse their decision. Tell them that now they should go certified organic!!
Write them at Frito-Lay, P.O. Box 660634, Dallas, TX, 75266-0634

At the Institute for Genetics in Kazakhstan, former Soviet biowarriors are being financed by the US and Britain to test mycoherbicides. Fusarium oxysporum strains that infect coca plants are closely related to those that attack yams, a staple in the Andean diet. Along with the other enormities presently perpetrated in the name of the War on Drugs, the United States is now actively preparing to deploy biological weapons. The weapons consist of plant pathogens designed to attack coca, cannabis and opium poppy crops. Research into the project has involved the resurrection of biological agents developed long ago at Fort Detrick, Maryland, center for the US biowar program closed down by President Nixon in 1969. Deep-frozen at the time of the program's termination, they are now being thawed out and readied for assault on producer countries in the third world. Also involved are veterans of the Soviet biological warfare effort, now being funded by the US through the connivance of an obscure UN agency, employed for this purpose in order to shield the U.S. from well-deserved charges of violating the internationally negotiated biological weapons convention.
The work is proceeding despite well attested evidence that the weapons, if deployed, will have profound and disastrous impact on the ecologies of the countries in which they are used. Furthermore, the USDA is now researching the use of genetic modification to enhance the potency of these bio-weapons. The principal agents under development are microbial pathogens. At the Institute for Genetics in Kazakhstan, former Soviet biowarriors are being financed by the US and Britain to test mycoherbicides, fungi, specifically Pleospora, to kill opium poppies & marijuana plants. In the Andes and western Amazon, the U.S. is planning the testing and widespread application of fusarium oxysporum, an anti-coca fungus. The FY 2000 budget contains at least $23 million for these programs, although further appropriations are almost certainly buried in covert military and intelligence budgets.

The prospect of being on the receiving end of a biological attack is not alluring to countries such as Peru, Bolivia and Colombia. The Peruvian government has already banned the testing and or deployment of the fungi. The Colombian government is similarly queasy, but has been sharply admonished by the project's supporters in the US Congress that if Colombia wants its $1.8 billion aid package, it had better take the fungi too.
Last March, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Benjamin Gilman, R-N.Y., added an amendment to the Colombian aid bill requiring President Clinton to certify that the Colombian government "has agreed to and is implementing a strategy to eliminate Colombia's total coca and opium poppy production" using, among other means, "tested, environmentally safe mycoherbicides." The amendment is still in the bill (which is still stalled in the senate) despite a submission by Colombian scientists to the Colombian Ombudsman for the Environment that the use of mycoherbicide agents in Colombia represents "a great danger both for Colombian humans as well as for the Colombian environment and biodiversity".
It is easy to see why the Colombians are worried. The absolute requirement of this sort of weapon is that it should be "host specific", ie. that it should attack only the intended victim and nothing else. According to Ed Hammond of the Sunshine Project, which has researched & publicized this enormity, tests conducted by USDA-contracted researchers in 1994 and 1995 using the favored strain of the fungus fusarium oxysporum-EN4-resulted in two non-coca species becoming infected.
Furthermore, fusarium oxysporum strains that infect coca plants are closely related to those that attack yams, a staple in the Andean diet. This is hardly surprising, Hammond points out, in view of the fact that EN4 is designed to attack different strains of coca and therefore cannot be entirely host specific. Thus the rare and beautiful Agrias butterfly may soon fall as one more casualty of the War on Drugs, since its larvae feed and mature on wild relatives of the coca plant. One of the few remaining areas where Agrias can be found is the upper Putamayo river region, a center both of guerrilla activity and coca cultivation in Colombia and therefore a prime target for the US fungus spraying campaign.

Meanwhile, back at the lab, USDA researchers have been working to create genetically modified strains of the fungi, including the cloning of fusarium strains that attack potatoes, in order to produce something still more vicious. However, in their search for instruments of what is officially known as "bio-control", the govt's researchers have also, it seems, reached back into the past. Sometime before 1969, according to documents supplied to Hammond under the FOIA, a team from APHIS, the USDA's plant & animal inspection service, found a virus on a Datura tree imported from Cauca, Colombia. Someone, it is not clear who, determined that the virus could be useful as an anti-opium poppy agent, and it was dispatched to the US biological warfare center at Ft Detrick, Maryland under the label D-437.
Following Nixon's order to close the place down, D-437 was not destroyed but put in deep frozen storage, forgotten by all but the researchers who had worked so happily at Detrick. On April 12 this year, Hammond caught a brief mention of D-437 on a US Army website, along with the fact that it was being studied by a Dr Vernon Damsteegt, himself a Detrick veteran. Following enquiries by Hammond, all mention of the virus and its custodian was hurriedly removed from the site, which now carried a fraudulent notification that it had last been updated on April 6.
1969 was the year Richard Nixon launched his war on drugs, using it to set up what was intended to be his very own secret police force - the Drug Enforcement Agency, a story chronicled in Edward J. Epstein's great book Agency of Fear.

Biological warfare was integral to the US war against Vietnam. CounterPunchers will recall Agent Orange, the hellish brew deployed to defoliate the jungle. Agent Blue, targeted on rice production, is less well known. The aim was to wipe out the NLF's food supply. Rice plantations deemed to be servicing the enemy were duly sprayed and obliterated. Professor Matthew Meselsen recalls how, early in 1970, he was taken by a US Army Chemical Corps colonel to survey a valley in an upland area that had been sprayed with Agent Blue some weeks before. As they flew over the devastated valley, the colonel proudly explained to Meselsen that this had obviously been an NLF food supply area since there were no houses to be seen.
Later, they landed at a nearby village that turned out to be thronged with refugees from the valley. The refugees explained that they had fled because the Americans had just destroyed their rice crop. Scrutinizing photographs he had taken from the air, Meselsen later detected numerous houses that had been invisible while flying overhead at speed. A simple calculation revealed that the amount of rice under cultivation in the valley had been just sufficient to feed the locals, with none left over to feed hungry Vietnamese guerrillas. Meselsen wrote a report that prompted some political qualms in the US command in Vietnam, which recommended to Washington that Agent Blue be terminated. The recommendation was leaked to the Washington Post, whereupon Nixon cancelled the program forthwith.
It is a measure of the obtuse barbarity of our present generation of drug warriors that they make Richard Nixon look sane. Despite abundant evidence of the dangers of deploying bioweapons such as the fungi in the wild, the US appears determined to press ahead.
Counterpunch is published twice monthly except Aug. 22 issues a year: $40 individuals, $100 institutions & supporters $30 student/low- income.
3220 N St NW, PMB 346 Wash. DC, 20007-2829 800.840.3683 fax 800.967.3620

Terminator SeedWatch forum
Kiwi chaos math prof on bioengineering: Chris King's Genesis of Eden
Bio WorldWatch
Lederberg   video clip   "I was rather fearful when the first positive results came in."
U.S. eugenics program   EugenicsWatch ¹
higher order mammal clonemeister Neil First, UWisconsin, at work
Howard Garber OC eugenicist candidate for 46th Cong. Dist.
Nierika, healer & first order morlock.   Currently seeking evidence of horizontal gene transfer as causing prions & resultant disease vectors

On March 23, 1971, Richard Nixon received a $3 million dollar cash gift from the dairy industry. The giving of that gift was recorded on a Watergate tape. A few months later, Nixon set price controls for milk that guaranteed the price farmers receive for 100 pounds of milk would never fall below $9.90. In November 1999, dairy farmers were receiving $16.49 for 100 pounds of milk. One month later, the price of milk fell $4.77, a traumatic financial event for dairymen and their families.
In January, 2000, the wholesale price of milk fell below the governmental support price for the first time in history. As demand for liquid milk decreases, farmers continue to produce more milk. Genetic engineering was a deception. The promise of more milk as a "dairy management tool" was a mere deception meant to betray the small dairyman.

    nutrition
"
I was raised on a diary farm and very much addicted to dairy products, especially cottage cheese & sharp cheddar cheese. Just thinking of these foods has my mouth watering but I gave it up because I believe it's behind many diseases on the increase & one of the major reasons Americans suffer one of the highest rates of chronic diseases, heart disease, cancer, asthma, diabetes, etc. I am a type I diabetic, and while I don't believe that eliminating dairy products from my diet will restore my islet cells' ability to produce insulin, it will help me to avoid the many complications related to diabetes. As a health aide of 17yrs working with elderly, I have seen the slow deterioration that occurs, literally, in bits and pieces until death. Being diagnosed 10yrs ago, I set about my search for a diet that would help me to not only control my blood sugars but improve my overall nutritional status, so that my body would be empowered to fight off the degenerative effects of unstable blood sugars. This has occurred one step at a time.

So far, I've eliminated: All canned, processed, packaged convenience foods, fast foods, cooked foods (except steamed veggies and homemade whole-grain breads), meat, eggs, dairy, caffene, all store beverages, tap water, refined grains, white flour, refined sugars, artificial sweetners, hydrogenated oils, margarines.
Result: Lowered insulin needs to about one third what it was 10yrs ago from 82 units to just under 27units, daily. I have no further deterioration of eyesight, no circulatory, nerve, or any other symptom or complication associated with diabetes. I have not relied on doctors advice, and in fact, have not seen a doctor in the past 10 years. All of my diabetic patients relied on their doctors, but they got sicker by the day. They were never told to make any major modifications to their diet with the exception of "don't eat anything with sugar". The only modifications they were given, use artificial sweetners instead of sugar and restrict calories. The average time it took for them to die (depending on age of dx) from the time of onset, was about 14 years with the last 5years usually in a wheelchair because of amputation and blind.

So, what do I eat ?

    Corporate concept of free market
    Price Fixing at Kraft
    3.97   John E. Peck Z Magazine
Vertical integration by means of factory farms & lobbying for favorable policy. 1993 $90+ million in Justice Dept fines & penalties, as well as 24 criminal indictments, against 48 executives & 43 companies found guilty of rigging dairy prices
    Sachets can purify water in developing world
    5.17.01   Reuters
LONDON   Low-cost water purification sachets can help to relieve malnutrition in developing countries & disaster areas with contaminated water supplies, researchers said Friday. The biodegradable sachets are not infant formula and are not meant to replace breastfeeding. They are designed for milk-based food for malnourished children where clean water is scarce. The two-compartment sachets contain a dry therapeutic feed and a semipermeable membrane that is filled through osmosis when it is placed in water. "You can take the bag which is like a piece of Clingfilm (plastic food wrapping) with sugar inside and drop it in muddy, filthy water, and four hours later you have clean water," Prof. Andrew Tomkins, of the Ctr for Intl Child Health at Great Ormond St Hospital in London, told Reuters. "In an emergency situation before you have wells or chlorine tablets it will be very effective," he added.
Tomkins & other research scientists in Bangladesh did an analysis of the sachets which is published in The Lancet medical journal. 35 women in Bangladesh urban areas found they were easy to use and took about 4© hours to work. "We have shown that mothers in urban Bangladesh can be successfully trained in the use of the osmotic sachets for the preparation of microbiologically safe therapeutic milk," SK Roy, of the Ctr for Health & Population Research in Dhaka, said in a report in the journal. The sachets, produced by British-based UCB Films Plc, can be used to produce food for malnourished children or without the feed to purify contaminated water.
Barley Green, Juiced Vegetables(especially organic carrots), Whole grains, Nuts, seeds, Fresh (uncooked) Fruits, Vegetables, and steamed veggies. This is God's diet: live whole foods as they were intended to be eaten as our bodies were designed to thrive healthy, strong, active, well into our 90's,100's and beyond. Diet isn't the whole answer but a place to start."
  Ruth Rathbun

Hacres


There are thousands of vistas in America affording material for sermons on the folly and greed of man, but few so stark and wretched as San Diego County, now distinguished by having the highest rate of habitat loss and more endangered plant & animal species than any county in the United States. The butchery has accelerated hotly in the Clinton/Gore era, with the developers unleashed by a dreadful instrument of the "win-win" school of deregulation (Multi-Species Conservation Plan, in their language) now supervised by Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt. "Win-win" means developers get the prime habitat and endangered species get a culvert ("wildlife corridor").
By the mid-nineties, S. California's coastal sage scrub had almost disappeared; so had 97 per cent of the vernal pools. Southern maritime chapparal had been reduced to 2400 acres in California. The chapparal has gone, and so too, as a site for anything but high-priced real estate, has poor, bulldozer-carved Carmel Mountain.

So far as coastal habitat in S. California is concerned, the destruction is virtually complete, but head south from Los Angeles, turn east after Oceanside and head for Ramona or Julian. You'll discover that at the heart of San Diego County are mountains forming a blue wall between the coast and the deep desert. Rising from these peaks, and buffering them from the cities, are the magnificent rolling grasslands and oak-covered foothills of what San Diegans call the back country, its pastures carrying not only cattle but live oak and golden eagles, profuse other bird life, cougar. The country looks dry but it is an enormously important watershed, supplying the coastal cities with as much as 15 per cent of their water.
Right now, the real estate market in California is so feverish that the big ranches are ripe targets for "development" the minute they are reaoned out of agricultural designation and onto the open market. Given the power of the developers, this transition from cattle baronies to real estate cash should have been easy, were it not for the efforts of a small group of environmentalists.

Over the past 10 years, Save Our Forest & Ranchlands (SOFAR) run by Duncan McFetridge, a woodworker living in Descanso, forty miles east of San Diego, has been waging a stubborn campaign against the suburbanization of the back country. We're not talking firebrands here. We're talking League of Women Voters, surfers, San Diego Baykeeper and assorted defenders of snakes, salamanders, lions and oaks. SOFAR put together a coalition of enviro & community groups and sued the county for failing to protect the back country. In 1996, Superior Court Judge Judith McConnell found San Diego County grossly negligent and in violation of several state laws and its own environmental standards. McConnel gave tiny SOFAR authority over hundreds of thousands of back-country acres.
Finally, earlier this year, the county came up with a plan. It assumed the destruction of all 200 thousand acres of rangelands, with division of this savaged terrain into ten & forty acre parcels, demurely described as small farms. This pleasing vision of mom & pop truck farms raising mangoes, orchids and macadamia nuts (the Farm Bureau's disingenuous version) collides with the reality that this part of San Diego has no ground water suitable for such specialty farming, and little other infrastructure.

The real future under the county plan would be luxury ranchettes and theme parks linked by new freeways and serviced by off-ramp commerce. In other words, exactly the sort of unsmart growth that everyone from Vice-President Gore to the San Diego Association of Governments has been complaining about.

    Filner bill takes aim at military polluters
    Lawmaker wants federal regulators to assess fines 6.16.01   Eric Rosenberg Hearst News Service
WASHINGTON   A House lawmaker said yesterday he wants to force U.S. military installations to clean up the pollutants they dump into nearby neighborhoods. Rep. Bob Filner, D-San Diego, introduced a bill this week that would close loopholes exempting the armed forces from certain environmental laws that penalize companies or individuals for polluting. For example, the military is exempt from the Oil Pollution Act and sections of the Clean Water Act. Nuclear reactors that power some Navy vessels are exempt from oversight from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which enforces environmental compliance by commercial nuclear reactors. Filner's bill would direct federal regulators to levy fines against the military for pollution infractions. Regulators currently have limited ability to assess such fines.
The congressman acknowledged that he faces an uphill struggle to build support in the Republican-controlled House for the measure. Co-sponsors include liberal Democratic Reps. Nancy Pelosi of California, Cynthia McKinney of Georgia and Diana DeGette of Colorado. "This is a tough bill to pass," Filner said at a news conference here. "It will not happen overnight." He added that the military has been environmentally "unaccountable" for the last several decades. In a letter to House colleagues seeking their support, Filner said, "Communities bordering military bases have less environmental protection than other cities in the nation just because they are hosts to the U.S. military."

A Pentagon spokesman could not be reached for comment. The Military Toxics Project, a Lewiston, Maine-based environmental cleanup organization, charged that the military has created an "environmental catastrophe" in many communities by dumping pollutants that have seeped into ground water or by releasing harmful emissions into the air. For example, it said, Cape Romanzof Long Range Radar Station in Alaska, 460 miles west of Anchorage, contains contaminated landfills, fuel-spill areas and leaking underground storage tanks, all of which pose a threat to nearby communities. Another polluted area is the region surrounding Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the region has substantial ground-water contaminants, including heavy metals, solvents and fuels.
Last year, more than 260 Dept of Defense facilities were either on or proposed for the EPA's list of the most- polluted sites around the country.


People's Rally for Military Environmental Responsibility Act (MERA)!
Cong. Filner, Peace Resource Ctr, Ocean Beach People's Co-op, HERE Local 30
Environmental Health Coalition 6.16.01 Port Planning Ctr Plaza, 585 Harbor Ln SD
proposed federal legislation sponsored by Bob Filner would remove all exemptions of the Dept of Defense from environmental and health & safety laws. Rally part of National Day of Action for Military Accountability
Connie Garcia, Environmental Health Coalition
1717 Kettner Blvd ste 100 SD CA 92101 619.235.0281

"We have had great success in this nation in the 1970s and 80s enacting environmental laws, and yet it turns out the military, one of the biggest, most economically powerful and most capable organizations of doing damage to the environment, is not fully subject to these laws." MERA sponsor Congressman Bob Filner


Not to be defeated, SOFAR and its allies brought the new plan to the attention if the Environmental Protection Agency. On March 31, Nancy Woo, the agency's regional chief, sent a letter to the San Diego County supervisors & Mayor Susan Golding advising them that the plan threatened the quality & quantity of the region's water & would gravely affect air, endangered wildlife and open space. Woo's letter threw the county officials into desperation. It looked as though the scheming of years had gone for nought. Then, at the last minute, came an amazing giftfrom the EPA. Five days later, on the eve of a crucial April 5 county meeting, Woo rushed another letter to the frantic San Diego officials. She said she had misinterpreted the plan and that her first letter should be disregarded.

In fact, Woo had not misinterpreted any significant part of the plan. But, crucially, in her second letter, she did not advise the board to withhold approval pending further study. The supervisors were off the hook and delightedly passed the amendment that could mean San Diego's back country will disappear into condo land, interspersed with Indian casinos. But the game is not quite over. Because the county is still under court supervision, the plan can't go ahead until Judge McConnell signs off on it.
So here we have a major environmental disaster in the making, one that is an obvious test case for any supposed commitment by local, state and federal government to bar insane squandering of natural resources. We have county government acting as a creature of the big developers. We have a weak regulatory agency, with the nature-rapers held in check only by a stubborn group like SOFAR.

This is but one episode in a dire national story. I don't want to be construed as offering endorsement or encouragement, but what drives groups like Earth Liberation Front to court lifetime prison sentences by burning a ski-condo development in Vail, or Boise Cascade offices in Oregon? The people who drive them to it, who are convinced that the fix is in, that the govt is always bought, have been these past eight years men like Gore and Babbitt, so much more supple and therefore dangerous than Reagan's Interior Secretary James Watt, who was such a dunderhead he set back the course of environmental destruction by a decade.
  A House on Fire ¹
excerpt Connecting Biological & Linguistic Diversity Crises
Kieran Suckling exec. dir., Ctr for Biological Diversity
courtesy of Student Ethnobotany Network
per 1899 Old Farmer's Almanac  
The odor of the sweet pea is so offensive to flies that it will drive them out of a sickroom, though not in the slightest disagreeable to the patient.  
"When you lose a language, it's like dropping a bomb on a museum."
Kenneth Hale, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"We are accelerating toward a calamity unparalleled in planetary history … These are crucial years for us to act, as the Library of Life burns furiously around us, throughout the world."
Gregory Benford, UCIrvine
Linguistic Extinction
The diversity of co-existing languages & cultures prior to the ongoing colonization of the globe by a small number of dominant nations was astounding. In what is now California, indigenous peoples once spoke over100 distinct languages. This small area supported more linguistic diversity than all of Europe. Over 300 native languages were spoken in whatis now the United States. Meso-America had 80 distinct languages, S.America over 500. At least 250 distinct languages were spoken in aboriginal Australia.
The rate of eradication of these languages, and often the people who spoke them, is equally astounding. Sixty-five percent of California's indigenous languages are extinct, with many of the remaining spoken by fewer than 10 people. Only two or three of California's indigenous languages are spoken by more than 150 people. None are spoken by children at home.

Just as "first world" societies replace diverse plant communities with monoculture crops, they are replacing a tremendous and ancient linguistic diversity with vast mono-languages. There are approximately 6,500 languages on Earth today. About 50% of all humans, however, speak and think in one often globally dominant languages. That means 0.2% of all existing languages hold sway over 50% of all humans and likely upwards of 85% of the land surface of the globe. Not surprisingly, these are the languages of the cultures primarily responsible for the global extinction crisis and the eradication/marginalizing of indigenous cultures. These cultures no longer recognize a limit to their beliefs or exploitation rights, because they no longer genuinely encounter and become situated by a diversity of other languages, ideas, cultures and species. The external world is simply a modulation of their own desires.

If we allow diversity to decline within human cultures and between cultures, we throw away the necessary mental tools to reverse the decline in biological diversity.


UN key agreement to save crop diversity ¹ ²
7.1.01   Reuters

ROME   The U.N. world food body reached a landmark agreement on Sunday to try to save the world's diversity of agricultural crops, officials said. The pact followed an anguished debate pitting many poor countries and environmentalists against multinational corporations and wealthier nations. After a week of touch- and-go talks, delegates said the United States had agreed for the first time in a public forum to mandatory payments by plant breeders and geneticists developing new crop varieties in return for access to public seed banks. The seed banks lend out crop seeds at no charge, enabling research into new varieties of plants to increase resistance to disease and ameliorate some of the impact of global warming. In turn, this helps alleviate hunger in poorer nations.
"This international undertaking is a milestone, it will allow the conservation of genetic resources for future generations," Jose Esquinas-Alcazar, secretary of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, part of the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), told Reuters. He said an international agreement to conserve plant genetic resources was needed because agricultural biodiversity was being lost at an alarming rate. Esquinas-Alcazar estimated that over time some 10,000 plant species had been used for human food and agriculture, but now no more than 120 cultivated species provide 90 percent of human food supplied by plants.
Representatives of 161 countries reached the agreement by consensus in the early hours of Sunday at FAO's headquarters in Rome after tough haggling over the details. But a separate, core issue over the patenting of seeds, where rich and poor nations differ most, failed to be resolved.

no consensus on patents
The biggest stumbling block was always the patents issue and after much agonized discussion, the meeting decided not to adopt a clause on intellectual property rights that limit access to seeds. The issue will be tackled instead by an FAO conference in November. Environmental groups say the

patenting of food and seeds by multinational companies threatens food security and access by farmers to genetic resources. The life sciences industry, on the other hand, believes that seed patents are a vital incentive for research. Sunday's agreement, encompassing 34 nutritional crop groups and 39 forage crop groups, underlined the need to protect farmers' rights, enabling them to save, use, exchange and sell farm-saved seed.
Until now, seed exchanges have operated informally on the principle of "common heritage" -- an agreement that they are a shared international resource. Change has been forced by the U.N. Convention for Biological Diversity, which made nations responsible for their own genetic resources. FAO's November conference is expected to adopt Sunday's agreement, which will then be submitted to national governments for ratification, delegates said.
Saving crop diversity key to winning war on hunger
7.3.01   Reuters

MACCARESE, Italy   Agricultural biodiversity must be saved in order to guarantee global food security as the population grows and the planet warms up, a leading plant geneticist said on Tuesday. "Around 25% of all plant species are in some way under threat," Geoffrey Hawtin, director general of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), said. Speaking at the inauguration of IPGRI's new headquarters at Maccarese outside Rome, he said that research was urgently needed to save crop diversity as an insurance policy against global warming and a rapidly growing population. Some 800 million people go to bed hungry, according to the United Nations.
Scientists will have to develop plant varieties resistant to drought, salinity and disease in order to increase the rate of food production to keep up with the expanding population. But, plant varieties are becoming extinct at an unprecedented rate, according to IPGRI, an international institute dedicated to the conservation and use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. "Every year more than 15 million hectares of tropical forest are destroyed and...eight percent of plant species run the risk of extinction in the next 25 years," it said in a statement.
Over the past 50 years new high-yielding uniform varieties of crops have taken the place of thousands of local varieties across large productive areas. Hawtin said that in India 50-60 years ago some 30,000 different types of wheat existed, but now 90 percent of wheat acreage was from just 10 varieties as farmers demanded more productive crops. "This reduction in genetic diversity will have notable repercussions in the long term on food security," IPGRI said.

search for stronger plants
IPGRI works with its partners across the world to create crop varieties that are stronger, more productive and more nutritious. It uses traditional plant breeding methods and, to a lesser extent, biotechnology. Hawtin said that he welcomed Sunday's international agreement at the United Nations world food body which set a framework for the sharing and conservation of plant genetic resources, including access to the world's public seed banks. But he warned that it would be difficult for countries to agree on intellectual property rights for seeds.
Delegates from 161 nations meeting at the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) failed to resolve a core issue over the patenting of seeds, which pits many poor countries and environmentalists against multinational corporations and wealthier nations. A FAO conference, due to be held in November, will next consider the patents issue. "If a clause on patents is going to be adopted, it's going to have to be a very neutral statement," Hawtin told Reuters. "There is a positive side to patents, but we have to be careful that the negative effects...do not hurt the most vulnerable in society."
Environmentalist groups say the patenting of food and seeds by multinational companies threatens food security and access by farmers to genetic resources. The life sciences industry, on the other hand, believes that seed patents are a vital incentive

StarLink Bio-Corn found in white corn products
7.4.01   Wash.Post

WASHINGTON   StarLink corn, the genetically modified yellow variety whose presence in food products last fall resulted in widespread recalls, has been found for the first time in a white corn product. FDA discovered genetic material from StarLink corn in Kash n' Karry White Corn Tortilla Chips last month in response to a complaint from a consumer in Florida. An FDA official said the agency did not request a recall, but both the Kash n' Karry and Food Lion grocery chains pulled the house brand product from their shelves on Tuesday, according to the paper. No immediate comment was available from FDA officials or Aventis SA, the Franco-German pharmaceutical group that makes the biotech corn. Last fall, many corn chip and tortilla makers switched to white corn, which makes up less than 3% of U.S. corn market, to reassure consumers concerned about the possible presence of StarLink in their taco shells and corn chips.

At the time, producers said the use of white corn eliminated the risk of inadvertently introducing StarLink into their products. StarLink, genetically modified by Aventis CropSciences to be resistant to insects, was barred by U.S. regulators for human use because of concerns it might trigger allergic reactions such as rashes, diarrhea or breathing problems. EPA in 1998 approved the biotech corn variety, used by farmers to protect young plants from destructive plants, only for feed use. But traces of StarLink corn found their way into taco shells, chips and other food products, triggering the eventual recall of more than 300 U.S. foods. Dozens of people initially reported experiencing allergic reactions linked to StarLink-tainted food products last year. U.S. govt last month released a report showing that 17 people who had complained of possible allergy attacks after eating corn products had failed to show any signs of antibodies to StarLink's key component. But environmentalists said the report was flawed and inconclusive.

FDA found the StarLink gene in the white corn chips after being notified by Keith Finger, a Florida optometrist who was one of the 17 tested earlier. Finger said his wife bought the white corn chips after hearing reports that it could not contain StarLink. He said he ate some, suffered another, milder reaction and immediately contacted the FDA. An FDA official as saying the agency was "continuing to follow up on the situation." White corn is grown & distributed separately from yellow corn, and industry observers said there are no genetically modified varieties. But they also said it has proven impossible to prevent some commingling of conventional and modified, as well as white and yellow, corn. The mixing, they said, could happen at processing plants, during transportation and through cross-pollination in fields. An EPA advisory panel of experts will meet in Washington on July 17 to review new StarLink information and recommend whether or not to grant a request by Aventis to retroactively approve StarLink for human consumption.


for research. Italian President Carlo Azeglio Ciampi inaugurated the new headquarters of IPGRI, which is funded mainly by developed country donors and development agencies. It has a staff of 200 and 18 offices and research laboratories around the world.
  UN report: progress needs technology
  7.8.01   AP

MEXICO CITY   Govts will have to take advantage of genetically engineered food, cutting-edge medicine and technology to combat poverty in a world that comes far from meeting basic development goals, a United Nations report has concluded. The 11th annual Human Development Report, scheduled to be released in Mexico City on Tuesday, found that the world's richest countries are holding back scientific breakthroughs key to eradicating hunger and stamping out poverty. "The current debate in Europe & U.S. over genetically modified crops mostly ignores the concerns of the developing world,'' the report says, adding that crops altered to produce higher yields could revolutionize farming in Africa, Latin America and across the underdeveloped world. It further argues that the developed world's push to cap technology once widely available has hurt the world's poor, highlighting how the campaign to ban DDT has left tropical countries battling a new breed of Malaria- carrying mosquitos.
The report also faults wealthy nations for driving up international prices of prescription drugs by refusing to pay their share of high prices. "The citizens of rich countries must understand that it is only fair for people in developing countries to pay less for medicines and other products,'' the report says. "The report is intended to challenge prevailing skepticism about technology,'' Mark Malloch Brown, head of the U.N. Development Fund, said in a recent interview. "There is a view that the history of development was a history of technology's failure.'' The report ranked 174 countries based on income, education, life expectancy and health care, awarding Norway the world's highest standard of living. "This is a recognition that our government combines a good welfare system for all people with a dynamic economy,'' Norway's Prime Minister Jens Stolenberg said. "With a good welfare state you have people who are willing to take risks they can't take elsewhere,'' Stolenberg said. ``You have well-educated people with good health who are more productive and create a more dynamic economy.''

Stolenberg's country was followed in the rankings by Australia and Canada, the latter having topped the report 6 years in a row. African nations made up 29 of the report's 36 worst performers, with war-ravaged Sierra Leone lodged at rock bottom for the second-straight year. A baby born in Sierra Leone today will likely die before it turns 39, compared to Norway's life expectancy of 79. U.S. slipped from third to sixth in this year's report. Ranked at 134, Haiti was the Americas' least-developed nation. At last year's unprecedented U.N. Millennium Summit, countries pledged to reduce mortality rates for children under 5 by two-thirds, cut poverty in half, and reduce the percentage of their citizens living without drinking water by 50% all by 2015.
But without the aid of new technology, most of the world has no chance of meeting those goals, according to the report, which notes that 30,000 children under age 5 die worldwide of preventable causes everyday, almost 1 billion people live without safe drinking water, and 1.2 billion people are still forced to survive on less than $1 per day.


As gulf grows, some nations make high-tech leap ¹
7.9.01   Reuters

UN   The gulf between the world's plugged-in and the shut-out is widening, but scores of developing nations are using technology to keep from falling further behind in the global economy, a new report has found. The Human Development Report 2001 commissioned by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) argues that information and communications technology can help overcome barriers of social, economic and geographic isolation. While Silicon Valley and similar tech centers in Europe and Japan are now legendary, world- class hubs also have emerged in Campinas and Sao Paulo, Brazil, Bangalore, India, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Gauteng, South Africa and El Ghazala, Tunisia.

The 264-page study highlights new options for poor people using the Internet for political empowerment, such as with the global e-mail campaign in January that helped topple Philippine President Joseph Estrada. Other examples include distance learning projects in Thailand and Turkey and job growth created by technology exports from Costa Rica, India and South Africa. "Often those with the least have the least to fear from the future, and certainly their governments are less encumbered by special interests committed to yesterday's technology," the report said of opportunities developing countries now have. But the report also concludes that most important technology advances bypass the world's poor because of lack of market demand, inadequate public funding and focus of innovative research efforts on high-income consumers.

technology offers hope to fast-moving countries
The annual report, which will be released in Mexico City on Tuesday, includes a ranking of the world's leading hubs of technology innovation and achievement. Using measures ranging from the number of patents granted per country to Internet usage, high-tech exports, telephone and electricity capacity, and science education, the U.N. agency divides 72 nations of the world into leaders, potential leaders, dynamic adopters and the marginalized. Finland, a leader in wireless communications whose 5 million people enjoy widespread access to mobile phones and the Internet, edges out the United States, Sweden, Japan and South Korea in the breadth and depth of their technology achievements.

Potential leaders range from Portugal and Spain to Greece in southern Europe, eastern European nations such as Poland and the Czech Republic, Asian tiger economies such as Hong Kong and Malaysia and Mexico, Costa Rica and Chile in Latin America. Dynamic adopters include countries with little prior technology investment who are seeking to adopt the latest advances in technology to potentially catapult themselves to the front of the pack in the next generation of technologies.
Since 1998, for example, Thailand has developed the first nationwide, free-access Internet network for education in Southeast Asia. SchoolNet@1509, as it is known, relies on just 120 access lines to provide schools with a single Web browsing account and up to two links for Web development.

While each school must make do with only 40 hours of access a month, the project has helped thrust Thai schools into the global information exchange. In India, where only 15 million people, or less than 2% of the population have access to telephones, a low-cost wireless system is under development that could cut telecommunications costs by one-half to two-thirds, making such systems affordable to up to 200 million Indians.
The Indian Institute of Technology in Madras, local company Midas Communications Technologies and U.S.-based circuit maker Analog Devices Inc. < ADI.N > have cooperated to develop a low-cost Internet access system that requires no modem and eliminates the need for expensive copper lines. The wireless local phone system is already in use from Fiji to Yemen to Nigeria and other nations are considering introducing it.

marginalization faces countries that fail to keep pace
The list of marginalized countries includes many of those torn by civil strife in recent decades, ranging from Nicaragua, with 39 phone lines per 1,000 people, to Mozambique, with no known Web connections and only five phones per 1,000 people. Developing countries continue to struggle with the high cost of basic electronic infrastructure that is the precondition for enjoying any benefits of high technology.
Africa has less international bandwidth than Sao Paulo, Brazil, a city of 10 million people. More fundamentally, electric power generation is not available to 2 billion, or fully one-third of the world's people. A little under half of the globe have no access to basic sanitation, the report said. Monthly Internet access charges amount to 1.2% of average monthly income for a typical U.S. user, compared with 614% in the island nation of Madagascar, 278% in Nepal, 191% in Bangladesh and 60% in Sri Lanka. Wealthy industrial nations, with under 20% of the world's people, accounted for 79% of Internet links and 91% of the 347,000 new patents issued in 1998, according to the U.N. survey.

LONDON   The World Health Organization (WHO) & 6 publishing companies said on Monday they would provide the latest biomedical research via the Internet to thousands of scientists and researchers in the developing world. Almost 1,000 leading medical and scientific journals and eventually textbooks will be available online for free or at reduced prices to medical schools and research institutions in nearly 100 countries. "The initiative is tremendously important and exciting," Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, director-general of the WHO, told a news conference in London. "It will enable many thousands of doctors, health workers and researchers to access information that is very important."

The initiative follows similar moves by pharmaceutical companies to improve access and reduce prices of life- saving drugs in poor countries. It is part of a wider United Nations-led incentive to bridge the health gap between wealthy & poor nations. Many doctors and scientists in the developing world have little access to medical journals, which until now were sold for the same price throughout the world. Annual subscriptions range from hundreds of dollars to more than $1,000 a year. "Nearly 100 developing countries will gain access to vital scientific information they could otherwise not afford," Brundtland added.
Dr. Richard Smith, editor of the British Medical Journal, described the initiative as having the potential to transform the medical environment in developing nations from a desert into a garden. The project is due to be up and running in the beginning of 2002 and expected to last for at least three years while its progress is monitored. Anglo-Dutch publishing group Reed Elsevier, the U.S. Harcourt Worldwide STM Group, American health care publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Germany's Springer Verlag, John Wiley & Sons Inc of the United States and Britain's Oxford-based Blackwell Sciences Ltd. will work with the British Medical Journal and the Open Society Institute of the George Soros foundation network on the project. All the publishers said the journals will be free online in the poorest countries and at reduced prices, which are still to be set, in lower-income nations. None of the publishers or the Soros Foundation, which will assist with the project, could say how much it will cost.

WASHINGTON   As the U.S. economy slows, lawmakers from farm states have begun pushing for Congress to pass a new farm bill this year for fear of losing tens of billions of dollars earmarked for subsidies. Rather than wait until next year as initially planned, farm-state lawmakers are launching an ambitious bid to have the scheduled rewriting of long-term farm policy completed before the end of the year in case shrinking tax revenues force Congress to make budget cuts. "If you wait around too long, there won't be any money left," said Tom Buis of the National Farmers Union. Under the budget blueprint approved by Congress this spring, farm outlays would rise by $73.5 billion, or 78 percent, for fiscal 2002-11. But there is concern that might be revised in light of the economic slowdown.
Written every few years, so-called farm bills are omnibus legislation, tying together farm subsidy, public nutrition, research, conservation and export promotion programs. The last one, dubbed "Freedom to Farm," deregulated farming in 1996 and capped farm subsidies at a few billion dollars a year. This time, there are calls to double or triple outlays on conservation and to write a formula -- potentially costing billions of dollars -- to automatically send more money to farmers when prices slump. Congress has enacted nearly $25 billion in bailouts to offset low prices since October 1998. House to tackle bill soon
"We expect to bring that bill to the floor before the end of the year and hope to have it in place for next year's crop," Agriculture Committee chairman Larry Combest told the House shortly before its Independence Day recess. The Texas Republican intends to circulate an outline of items for inclusion in the farm bill early this week. It would be immediately followed by hearings to gather reaction from farm groups. The committee would write its bill in late July, finishing before Congress begins its month-long summer recess on Aug. 3. When Congress reconvenes in early September, Combest will gauge the pace in the Senate with the hope the House could pass the bill "in time for the bill to go to the president before Congress leaves for the year," a committee staff worker said.
"That's his goal. He's been told repeatedly all his goals are ambitious." Leaders have set Oct. 5 as the target for ending this year's congressional session. There was skepticism the target could be met since many must-do bills needed action. Senators initially planned to assemble their farm bill next year, so it would first apply to 2003 crops. Iowa Democrat Tom Harkin, newly installed as Agriculture Committee chairman, has declined to set a timeline for action. But he says bill-drafting might begin as early as this fall. "The farm bill should be completed this year -- because the funding may not be available next year," Vermont Democrat Sen. Pat Leahy said during the first hearing called by Harkin, an overview of farm bill issues 10 days ago. A spokesman for Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar, the Republican leader on the Senate committee, said Harkin and Lugar "are in general agreement. They aren't going to rush this." "We'd all like to have it done before election year, but I'm not sure there's time," said Sen. Pat Roberts, a Kansas Republican.

green payments in next bill?
If House hearings are an indicator, the outline circulated by Combest will realign crop support rates, propose a mechanism for "counter-cyclical" payments when markets wilt and offer a guaranteed annual subsidy to growers. Those were common requests from farm groups, as well as so-called planting flexibility -- the power to switch crops in pursuit of profits without jeopardizing eligibility for subsidies. Harkin was the sponsor of a plan to pay farmers up to $50,000 a year for making land, water and wildlife conservation part of their operations. The idea of "green" payments was attractive to fruit and vegetable growers, who do not get direct subsidies as grain, cotton and soybean farmers do. A major issue in the farm bill debate may be how to divide money between traditional crop subsidies and conservation programs that have become popular since the 1985 farm law.
Requests for more than $260 billion in new spending have been handed to the House Agriculture Committee, says its Democratic leader, Charles Stenholm of Texas. "We want the debate to get going," said Bob Stallman, president of the American Farm Bureau Federation. The group does not "want to run a risk of losing those budgeted dollars," he said, but not if it meant a poorly thought-out bill. Dave Orden, co-author of book analyzing the 1996 law, said there may be a financial downside to locking up funding now. "Farm bills tend to get more generous" the longer Congress works on them, he said. While the pace in Congress was picking up, "My betting is still on next spring or later" for sending the bill to the president for enactment.

7.25.01contra … "petition that Frontiers of Freedom (FF), a conservative front group for various natural resource industries, has presented to the IRS. FF is seeking to destroy Rainforest Action Network (RAN) by revoking their tax-deductible 501(c)(3) status on the grounds that RAN engages in activities that publicly pressure corporations, in particular Boise Cascade Corporation (BCC). …

presented by §
OCIAL
JUSTICE  
Discount Credit Card Processor | CT Connecticut Buy Auto Policy | Guitar Lessons Book | Infocus Projectors | Affordable Marketting Services