As with many treaties, the countries that agree to those international standards on child soldiers
are expected to be the ones least likely to violate them. Some of the most egregious violators may
not sign, while others may sign and simply ignore the provisions, given that the protocol provides
no real enforcement to punish violators. But administration officials and other supporters of the
protocol agreement said yesterday that it would help to stigmatize the use of children in combat,
especially since the Convention on the Rights of the Child has strong international support. Only
the United States and Somalia have yet to ratify the overall agreement.
The U.S. compromise amounts to a tactical retreat by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who had feared
that a strict age limit would prohibit recruiters from signing up 17-year-olds, who today can join the
military with parental consent. The Pentagon won the right to continue that practice but agreed to
take still-unspecified steps to keep those youngest soldiers and sailors out of direct warfare,
administration and defense officials said.
" The chiefs weren't crazy about it, " said a defense official in Washington, " but we felt we could
live with it with that kind of construction. "The new minimum will have little real effect on the U.S.
military, which has nearly 1.4 million men and women in uniform. Last year, 49,900 enlistees were
17 when they signed up to join the armed services, but only 11,000 were still 17 when they
reported to basic training. Of those, only 2,500 had not turned 18 by the time training was
completed.
But the Pentagon's retreat saved the administration the diplomatic embarrassment of blocking an
agreement meant to prohibit the use of soldiers as young as 9 or 10 in some of the world's most
brutal conflicts, a policy that officials at the State Department strongly advocated. Experts have
estimated that as many as 300,000 children are fighting in wars from Africa to Chechnya to Latin
America, many of them conscripted against their will.
For a time, it looked as if the negotiations would end like those on an international treaty to ban
land mines. In that case, the Pentagon's opposition to a broad ban kept the administration from
signing the treaty, despite support from the State Department and Clinton.
" This protocol is an important advance for human rights, " the president said in a statement
released by the White House yesterday. " At the same time, it fully protects the military recruitment
and readiness requirements of the United States. "
Clinton signed the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1995, but has yet to submit it for
ratification by the Senate, where it faces opposition from conservatives who argue that it usurps
the rights of parents.
Once the administration signs the protocol, it also will require Senate approval. Because of
opposition to the convention overall, the administration may well submit only the new protocol for
ratification, increasing the chances that the Senate would ratify it. But any move to ratify is not
expected to take place until the end of the year at the earliest.
The protocol also applies its standards to rebel groups or other factions that are not represented
by any government and so not party to it. Still, proponents said they hoped that the desire for
international recognition by some of those groups would curb the most extreme cases of putting
children into combat.
Santa Ana, Anaheim, Costa Mesa & Garden Grove CA U.S.
|
![]() Greens WebRing EDIT LISTING |